Venue: To be held remotely, please use the following link to access: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiQ94myD9cu1s3QpGP2R-MQ
Contact: Ann Jones on 0151 511 8276 Ext. 16 8276 or Email: ann.jones@halton.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 1 February 2021, having been circulated, were taken as read and signed as a correct record. |
|
PLANNING APPLICATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COMMITTEE PDF 65 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee considered the following applications for planning permission and, in accordance with its powers and duties, made the decisions described below. |
|
Minutes: The consultation procedure undertaken was outlined in the report together with background information in respect of the site. The Case Officer advised that since the publication of the AB Update List one more representation had been received. This raised issues relating to the traffic survey undertaken as well as drainage and increased flood risk which were already dealt with in the Committee Report. Following presentation of the application it was explained why it was recommended for refusal and the fundamental issues with the proposal were described, as outlined in paragraph 8 of the report relating to the following: ·
Greenspace
/ Strategic Greenspace / Potential Greenway / Green Infrastructure / Health and
Wellbeing; ·
Highways
/ Transportation; ·
Flood
Risk/Drainage; and ·
Trees
/ Landscaping / Landscape Impacts The Committee was addressed by Mr Peter Hurst, who as a long-standing member of the Golf Club, spoke in support of the application. He explained how the Club was once thriving with people of all social backgrounds offering various recreational activities to Members. Unfortunately, in recent times the membership at the Club had declined to a point where its existence was now threatened; he gave examples of reasons why this had happened. He argued that the Club would prosper if the application was approved as new membership would be encouraged by the new facilities. He also added that: ·
It
was not unusual for a town’s golf club to be situated outside its boundary; ·
Widnes
Golf Club was currently private land so there was no direct benefit to the
public as open space; ·
The
proposal would benefit existing and future residents of the Borough with its
high quality design and landscaping; ·
It
was in a sustainable location; ·
It
would bring affordable housing to the area and local investment; and ·
It
would relieve pressure to develop other green spaces in the Borough. In conclusion, he added that improvements in the sport’s technology had
changed the game over the past 60 years and the Club needed to respond to this. Mr Morris, the applicant, then addressed the Committee. He had been a member of Widnes Golf Club for
many years and now spoke as a Board Member in support of the application. He recognised the concerns made by the public
over the proposals in relation to the loss of green space. He advised that the Club was in financial
difficulty and if the development did not go ahead the Club faced an uncertain
future and the facility could be lost altogether. He explained the problems with the existing
substandard 18 hole course in relation to quality and drainage and how this had
affected its appeal and that improvements needed to be made. The Club had seen a reduction in membership
numbers over the years and now found itself in a challenging position, being
unable to maintain the Club or invest in its future. He added that: ·
The
current course was now too small and sub-standard; · There was no policy requirement for Widnes to have an 18 hole golf club; ... view the full minutes text for item 33. |
|
Minutes: The consultation procedure undertaken was outlined in the report together with background information in respect of the site. The Committee was advised that since the publication of the agenda and as per the published AB Update List, Highways Authority had responded to the amendments and were now satisfied with the layout subject to the additional conditions for car parking management plan, offsite highways works relating to the access and removal of a taxi rank, and a condition restricting the use of the retail unit to a bookmakers. Further comments had also been received from a local Ward Councillor raising the following matters: · The height of the building and requested a condition so that it could not be increased; · Securing and controlling provision of car parking; · A condition that materials, boundary treatments and landscaping were submitted and approved; and · The need for further site investigations. Members were advised
that the scale and appearance of the building had been submitted in full detail
and a condition was recommended so that it would be built in accordance with
the submitted plans, this would control the height of the building. The Ward Councillor
also wanted to be sure that any cladding used was fire safe and that the building
had suitable means of escape, both of these matters would be dealt
with under the Building Regulations for the project. The Committee was advised that the consultation
period was due to expire the following day and that delegated authority was
therefore sought to determine the application, in consultation with the Chair,
once the consultation had expired and considering any further comments
received. The recommendation was moved and seconded and
the Committee agreed to approve the application, subject to the conditions
listed below which include the additional conditions discussed above. RESOLVED: That authority be
delegated to the Operational Director – Policy, Planning and Transportation,
in consultation with the Chair, to determine the application, subject to any
consultation responses and to the following: a) a legal or other appropriate
agreement relating to securing financial contributions for open space; b) conditions relating to the
following: 1. Outline planning permission conditions
setting out time limits and reserved matters (BE1); 2. Condition specifying approved and
amended plans (BE1); 3. Requiring submission and agreement
of a Construction Management Plan including vehicle access routes and
construction car parking (BE1); 4. Materials condition, requiring the
submission and approval of the materials to be used (BE2); 5. Landscaping condition, requiring the
submission and approval of landscaping details (BE2); 6. Boundary treatments to be submitted
and approved in writing (BE1); 7. Wheel cleansing facilities/strategy
to be submitted and approved in writing (BE1); 8. Construction and delivery hours to
be adhered to throughout the course of the development (BE1); 9. Vehicle access, parking, servicing etc to be constructed prior to occupation of
properties/commencement of use (BE1); 10. Condition relating to the
implementation of bin store provision (BE1); 11. Requiring submission and agreement
of site and finished floor and site levels (BE1); 12. Site investigation, including mitigation/validation ... view the full minutes text for item 34. |