Venue: Marketing Suite, Municipal Building. View directions
Contact: Lynn Derbyshire on 0151 471 7389 or e-mail lynn.derbyshire@halton.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
MINUTES Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 18 November 2010 were taken as read and signed as a correct record. |
|
Minutes: The Board considered a report of the Strategic Director – Environment and Economy which informed Members that the Government had announced the decision for Mersey Gateway on 20th December and published the Secretaries of State Decision Letters along with the Public Inquiry Report and Supplementary Report produced by the Inspector Alan Grey. The report provided Members with a summary of the conclusions reached and the statutory powers either made, or confirmed, as a consequence of this decision. Members were also advised of the action now being taken to secure the land required for the scheme and to prepare for the procurement process now planned to commence in the spring. The Board
was advised that the report gave details of the summary conclusions which were consistent with the findings expressed in
the reports of the Inspector Mr Alan Grey relating to the applications and
orders made by the Council back in spring 2008 and considered at the Public
Local Inquiry that sat for twenty days between May and July 2009. The report plus all the documents relating to
the planning decision, were available on the Mersey
Gateway website and hard copies had been placed on deposit at the Kingsway and
Halton Lea Libraries and at Direct Link offices in The report
advised of the key factors emerging
from the Inspector’s conclusions. It was
noted that the decisions made by Government on 20th December had
triggered a number of statutory processes including the exercise of the
compulsory purchase powers enabled by the Compulsory Purchase Orders and the
made Order under the Transport and Work Act 1992. These powers allowed the project team to
acquire the land which was necessary for the construction and maintenance of
the Project. However, commencing the CPO
process did not require any further Council resolutions because such
resolutions were established at previous Council meetings. It was reported that the Council had served the
preliminary notices in the CPO process on the parties affected by these Orders
in two stages. A press release explaining that the Council was commencing the
CPO process had been issued. The notices issued covered all the known
interests in the land required for the scheme.
The actual programme for taking possession of the sites would be phased
over the next 18 months. In addition,
details of the programme for taking possession of specific sites would be
reported to the Board at future meetings. During the discussion, the Members noted the
approval process for the funding. It was
also noted that the objections had been fully dealt with and rejected during
the public enquiry and the focus now would be on delivering the project. RESOLVED:
That (1)
the substance of the decisions announced by
Government on 20th December, which either made or confirmed all the
statutory powers requested for Mersey Gateway be noted; and (2) The action now being taken by the project team to secure the land through exercising the compulsory purchase powers confirmed in the Transport ... view the full minutes text for item 11. |
|
SCHEDULE 12A OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (ACCESS TO INFORMATION) ACT 1985 Minutes: (1) whether Members of the
press and public should be excluded from the meeting of the Board during
consideration of the following items of business in accordance with Sub-Section
4 of Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 because it was likely that,
in view of the nature of the business to be considered, exempt information
would be disclosed, being information defined in Section 100 (1) and paragraph
3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972; and (2) whether
the disclosure of information was in the public interest, whether any relevant
exemptions were applicable and whether, when applying the public interest test
and exemptions, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed
that in disclosing the information. RESOLVED: That as, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, members of the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following items of business in accordance with Sub-Section 4 of Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 because it is likely that, in view of the nature of the business, exempt information will be disclosed, being information defined in Section 100 (1) and paragraphs 1, 3 and 5 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. |
|
(Note: Mr Nicholson declared
a Personal and Prejudicial Interest in the following item of business recommendation
2 (iii) due to it relating to the extension of his contract as the Mersey Gateway
Bridge Project Director and left the room during consideration of this recommendation). |
|
Appointment of Consultants Minutes: The Board considered a report of
the Strategic Director Environment and Economy which informed Members of the
decision of the Secretary of State for Transport to grant the necessary
consents for the construction of the RESOLVED: That (1)
Consultants to the Mersey Gateway Project, KPMG,
Gifford, EC Harris, Halcrow, GVA Grimley
and DLA Piper be retained and the Chief Executive in consultation with the
Leader and Portfolio Holder for Resources be authorised to determine the
detailed terms and contractual arrangements; (2)
The Framework Contract for Mott MacDonald be
extended to 30th April 2013 and that the Chief Executive in
consultation with the Leader and Portfolio Holder for Resources be authorised
to determine the detailed terms and contractual arrangements; (3)
Steve Nicholson’s contract as Mersey Gateway Bridge
Project Director be extended to 30th April 2013 and that the Chief
Executive in consultation with the Leader and Portfolio Holder for Resources be
authorised to determine the detailed terms and contractual arrangements for
that contract extension; (4)
The Chief Executive and Strategic Directors be
authorised to redeploy staff as necessary to ensure that the Mersey Gateway
Project Team has sufficient capacity to ensure the delivery of the Mersey
Gateway Bridge Project in a timely fashion; (5)
The contracts for Mr Scarisbrick and Mr Coulson as consultants within the Project Team be renewed
and that the Chief Executive in consultation with the Leader and Portfolio
Holder for Resources be authorised to determine the detailed terms and
contractual arrangements; and (6)
The award of a consultancy contract by the Strategic
Director Environment & Economy to Ian Draycott be noted. |
|
MINUTES ISSUED: 28 January 2011 CALL-IN: 4 February 2011 Any matter decided by
the |