Minutes:
The Board was advised that a
petition had been received, signed by 27 persons highlighting traffic issues,
associated with renovation works to Sutton Weaver Swing Bridge, that were
affecting Halton Station Road, Runcorn. It was noted that the Bridge was outside
of the Halton Borough boundary and was the responsibility of Cheshire West and
Chester Council (CWaC).
In order to renovate and carry out
essential repair work to the Sutton Weaver Swing Bridge (SWSB) which was over
the Weaver Navigation Canal, CWaC last year installed
a temporary bridge next to the existing crossing. Work on installing this
temporary bridge commenced in May 2013. Towards the end of August 2013, it then
closed the SWSB to traffic to allow its contractor unrestricted access to the
bridge and use of the temporary bridge commenced.
In addition, to improve traffic flow
through the temporary crossing, CWaC implemented restrictions at the junction
of the A56 Chester Road with the A557 Clifton Road, immediately east of the
swing bridge. The restrictions had prevented east-bound traffic from travelling
directly along the A56 Chester Road through Sutton Weaver as it would have done
previously. All traffic had instead been required to travel north along the
A557 Clifton Road into Halton, around the south roundabout of M56 motorway
Junction 12, with east bound/Sutton Weaver Village bound traffic then being
required to travel back along Clifton Road before re-joining the A56 Chester
Road adjacent to the SWSB. These arrangements indicated that this diversion
would be necessary for the duration of the works which was anticipated to end
in autumn 2014.
Whilst this had simplified and
accelerated traffic flows in the area of the bridge throughout the period of
the renovation works, not all of the re-routed traffic had followed the signed
diversion route. Some continued to choose to take what was effectively a short
cut by either turning right off Clifton Road into Halton Station Road or follow
the diversion to a point on Clifton Road where they could then turn left into
Halton Station Road and then travel along that road and onwards to Beechwood or
Sutton Weaver via Wood Lane. This had generated an unanticipated increase in
traffic flows along Halton Station Road which was a narrow, one way, traffic
calmed road that was also subject to a weight restriction.
The petition received from residents
of Halton Station Road highlighted a number of concerns about the diversion and
its impacts as follows:-
·
lack of
consultation and notification on the traffic diversions by both CWaC and Halton
Borough Council;
·
extra volume of
traffic using Halton Station Road, including heavy goods vehicles in
contravention of the existing vehicle weight restriction on the route.
·
excessive
speed of traffic, despite physical traffic calming in Halton Station Road;
·
vehicles
being driven partly on the footways of Halton Station Road to avoid traffic
calming features; and
·
concerns that CWaC may wish to make the temporary traffic routing
permanent when the bridge works were complete.
Members were advised CWaC had in place a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order
which supported the diversion route that had been established, but it was not
clear as to whether consultation was undertaken by CWaC with residents of
Halton Station Road. As it was not Halton Borough Council’s Scheme, it did not
undertake any consultation. However, Officers from Halton Borough Council had
been in regular contact with Halton Station Road residents since the problems
associated with the bridge diversion were highlighted. A meeting had taken
place in September 2013, once the bridge works started and the traffic
diversions were in place, there was little that could be done on a practical
level to mitigate the problems subsequently experienced.
It was noted that the need
for this diversion was felt to be reasonable on the grounds that it was meant
to be for a 12 month period only and as it avoided a total closure of the route
that would have, in turn, necessitated a diversion via either the M56 or A49
Acton Bridge. In addition, Officers had contacted Cheshire Police and requested
that it provide enforcement of the vehicle weight restriction on Halton Station
Road. Residents had also been encouraged to contact the Police over this and
other observed traffic issues. Officers had also spoken to the On-Duty Manager
at the Holiday Inn about the use of the road by HGVs and she agreed to e-mail
the delivery companies to remind them of the weight restrictions and speed
limit on Halton Station Road. The manager had also informed the Police and
requested that they enforce the weight restriction.
It was also noted that a traffic
count/survey of speeds that was taken once the diversions were underway,
recorded few vehicles exceeding the speed limit. However, this did not necessarily
mean that the traffic speeds could not be perceived as a possible road safety
issue, bearing in mind the characteristics of the road. With regard to the
request for temporary traffic cones, following consultation with the residents
it was confirmed that it was actually bollards which were being sought to
prevent vehicles being driven on the footways so as to partially avoid the
traffic calming measures. Unfortunately, the footways of Halton Station Road
were too narrow to permit the installation of bollards and this had been
explained to residents. Bus companies had also been contacted to request them
not to use Halton Station Road.
Although the completion date for the
works was not set, it was believed that the SWSB repairs would be completed in
the Autumn of this year. Therefore, whilst the works
should now be of a finite duration, it was likely that residents would continue
to be inconvenienced. Although no formal approach had yet been made by CWaC to
Halton Borough Council, it was understood that CWaC was now considering making
the temporary arrangements permanent. It would appear that CWaC had held local
meetings recently to discuss a range of traffic issues in that area of CWaC
including the possibility of making the bridge diversion layout permanent, but
unfortunately neither Halton Borough Council nor residents of Halton Station
Road were aware of this possible opportunity to raise their concerns. It was
therefore recommended that the Board supports submission of a formal objection
by the Council to CWaC in response to any proposal to make this temporary
arrangement permanent.
In accordance with Standing Order
No.34 (9), the following public question was submitted to the Board by Mr
Whitlow, Station Road, Runcorn by email:
“We the residents
of Halton Station Road Runcorn are extremely
concerned by the size, width, weight and speed that traffic is going up the
road blatantly avoiding speed bumps. We have and are enduring visible damage by
way of pathway damage (Cars hopping up to avoid speed bump) the wall outside
No.1 and No 8 have significant cracks up the front walls coupled with damage to
parked cars (visitors). The visible damage is a grave concern of ours as is the
weight of coaches, heavy plant and trucks using this B- Road as an access point, we believe that weight restrictions were enforced in Halton Station Road previously for good reason (previous
3.5T limit. There is a large number of houses that are not built on unorthodox
foundations and footings thus the vibration and weight distribution has cause
the notable damage as mentioned above however we know feel that our properties
are now at the detriment to this unreasonable traffic flow. We demand HBC send
out a structural surveyor to give us some clarity and assurance that our homes
are not suffering the same damage as the exterior garden walls etc. We are
extremely pragmatic about keeping a safe and transparent community thus will
attend this meeting accordingly”.
In
response Officers advised the Board that Halton Station Road was
a classified B-road with an environmental weight restriction in place. The
weight restriction was intended to prevent heavy through traffic using the
route but there was no structural requirement for the weight restriction. HGVs
and similar heavy vehicles are not prevented from entering the area but the
weight restriction was intended to prevent use of the road purely as a through
route: to use it HGVs should have business within the restriction area.
The enforcement of the weight restriction was the responsibility
of Cheshire Police, and they have been asked to give the area attention to this
but the Police have their own operational priorities and they cannot be
routinely present. The footpaths of Halton Station
Road were too narrow to allow the fitting of bollards without rendering them
too narrow for use by those in wheelchairs or with pushchairs.
The Council does not
normally carry out structural surveys of properties. It would arrange for
the walls adjacent to the footpath to be checked.
Arising from the discussion,
Councillor Logan addressed the Committee on behalf of residents and commented
on:
·
the
lack of consultation for Halton Station Road
residents by CWaC, future processes should be
transparent and not exclusive to CWaC residents;
·
impact
on the environment at Halton Station Road and cracks
in properties needed to be checked as they were evident;
·
psychological
impact on residents as their quality of life has changed with HGV’s regularly
using the road;
·
how have CWaC measured that traffic has improved?
·
Halton Station
Road could become a cul-de-sac in future.
Further, Councillor C Loftus, Ward Councillor for Halton
Station Road, also commented on the vibrations caused by speed bumps, police
not deeming the road a priority to enforce vehicle weight restrictions, drivers
using the pavement to avoid speed bumps and the need for a cul-de-sac.
In response the Board was advised that there would be implications for
other road users with regard to the introduction of a cul-de-sac at Halton Station Road and it was agreed that the proposal
would be investigated if the Temporary Traffic Order became permanent.
Arising from the discussion, a Member sought clarification on if
proposals by CWaC to make the Temporary Traffic Order
into a Permanent Traffic Order needed planning permission. It was agreed that a
response would be provided.
RESOLVED: That the Board:
(1) notes that Officers have contacted
Cheshire West and Chester Council on behalf of Halton Station Road residents,
setting out the problems its traffic diversions are causing;
(2) notes that Officers have also contacted Cheshire Police
requesting that it provides enforcement of the existing vehicle weight
restriction on Halton Station Road; and
(3) endorse the proposal to formally
object to any proposal by Cheshire West and Chester Council to make permanent
the present temporary traffic arrangements in the area of Sutton Weaver Swing
Bridge/Clifton Road.
Supporting documents: