Agenda item

- PLAN NO. 06/00887/OUT- Outline application for the erection of 34. No. residential units (comprising three and four storey apartment building) with landscaping matters reserved for future consideration, to the land at Former Oak Lodge, Richards Close, Runcorn.

Minutes:

The consultation procedure undertaken was outlined in the report together with background information in respect of the site. It was reported that one neighbour objection had been received which raised the seven issues listed below:

 

  • development was too close;
  • too much car parking next to existing bungalows when accessible to bus services;
  • loss of the landscaped area;
  • it was felt that it was wrong to utilise green space for car parking;
  • inappropriate access roads; and
  • noise pollution and access to existing flats and bungalows.

 

In response it was noted that:

 

§         the amended scheme had reduced the proposed numbers of units from 42 to 34 and at 86 units per hectare, this was appropriate for the size of the site, in view of the overall design of the proposal and would comply with Policy HR2 of the UDP;

§         the car parking provision at 125% per dwelling was appropriate for the location of the site near to a regular bus service and local centre;

§         as identified within the committee report, there had been inevitable loss of some landscaping to achieve the development.  However, this revised scheme retains a greater area of existing tress and proposed new tree planting.  It was considered that the regenerative benefits of the development outweigh the loss of landscaping as shown;

§         the area was not a designated greenspace and was within the general extent of the residential area within the UDP and Castlefields SPD, therefore the proposal would not conflict with the Council’s greenspace policies.

§         the Council’s highway engineer had raised no objection to the application in relation to the capacity of the access roads to the site;

§         it was accepted that there would be noise and pollution from vehicles. However, this would not be necessarily considerably worse than the previous use of the site.  The site’s proximity to the local bus services would provide good opportunities to use alternative forms of transport to private vehicles; and

§         the redevelopment of the site would not alter the current emergency access to the existing flats and bungalows, there would be sufficient access for this for the proposed development.  The applicant had agreed to upgrade the area currently used adjacent to Achillies Court for emergency and refuse access to existing properties at the request of the Highway Engineer.

 

The Committee was informed the applicant had expressed agreement to provide the appropriate financial contribution under the terms of the Open Space SPD.

 

It was reported that the plans had been amended to incorporate the bin storage areas nearer to the apartment blocks to avoid stand along structures and greater accessibility  for collection.

 

The Committee was advised the proposal was a step further forward in the regeneration of the Castlefields area and was compliant with the principles of the Castlefields SPD.

 

Requested modifications to the submitted plans in relation to highway and the requested tree survey had not yet been received at the time of the meeting.  In view of this it was requested that authority be deferred to the Operational Director of Environment and Regulatory Services in consultation with the Chairman and Vice Chairman, subject to the submission of acceptable amended plans and a tree survey.

 

RESOLVED: That the application be approved subject to the following:

 

A) the applicant entering into a legal agreement for the provision of off-site open space;

 

B)   the following  27 conditions listed below: -

 

1.             Standard Outline planning conditions (x 4)

2.   Subject to amended plans (Policy BE1, BE2)

3.            Provision in full of car parking prior to commencement of construction of building.

4.   Prior to commencement of development details of widening of adjacent footway provided and agreed in writing. (Policy BE1)

5.   Prior to commencement the submission of material samples for approval     (Policy BE2).

6.   Prior to the commencement details of tree protection measures (x7)(Policy   BE1).

7.   Prior to commencement the submission of details of all boundary treatments for approval (Policy BE22).

8.   Prior to commencement the submission of details of a hard and soft landscaping scheme (Policy BE1).

9.   Prior to commencement the submission of detailed species of soft landscaping for approval (Policy BE1).

10.Prior to commencement the submission of details of bin and cycle stores, to be secured, for approval (Policy BE2).

11. Prior to commencement the submission of a ground investigation and undertaking of any remedial works where required (Policy PR14).

12. Prior to commencement the submission of existing ground levels and proposed finished floor/ground levels for approval (Policy BE1).

13. Prior to commencement the submission of drainage details for approval (Policy BE1).

14. Prior to commencement the submission of details of wheel wash to be used throughout the course of the construction period (Policy BE1).

15.            Landscaping scheme to be implemented during the course of development or next available planting season (Policy BE1).

16.            Access, roads, car parking and service areas to be laid out prior to occupation of premises (Policy BE1, TP6, TP7, TP12 and TP17).

17. No lighting to be installed within the site or on the building without further approval from the Local Planning Authority (Policy BE1 and PR4).

18.            Restricted hours of construction (Policy BE1).

 

            The following amendment to condition No. 4 was stated as follows:

 

The condition should be extended to include the adjacent footpath to the north west of the site adjacent to Achilles court, in order to achieve a formalisation and “tidying up” of this area for emergency and refuse collection for existing dwellings.

 

C) That if the legal agreement is not executed within a reasonable period of time authority be delegated to the Operational Director – Environmental and Regulatory Services in consultation with the Chairman or Vice Chairman to refuse the application on grounds that it fails to comply with UDP Policy S25 Planning Obligations.