Minutes:
The Sub-Committee met to determine an application made under Section 17
of the Licensing Act 2003 for a premises licence for Banksey’s
Bar, 75 Albert Road, Widnes, WA8 6JS (“the Premises”). The hearing was held in accordance with the
Licensing Act 2003 and Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005.
The hearing was held as relevant representations has
been received from Cheshire Police, Environmental Health and 10 local residents.
The Applicant, Ms Bethany
Owens, was in attendance and was represented by her Solicitor, Mr Piers Warne. The other parties in attendance were:-
Lesley Halliday, Police Licensing
Officer,
Joanne Clarke;
Solicitor for the Police;
Lyn Fletcher and Dawn
Owens, two residents who live on Ross Street;
Prior to the hearing, the Sub-Committee had been
provided with evidence submitted by the parties, including a witness statement
from Lesley Halliday, screen shots of the opening hours of licensed premises in
the vicinity of the area and a video of the previous business that operated
from the Premises when it was known as Annie’s Bar which had been submitted by
Ms Fletcher. They had also received a list of the
licensed hours for the licensed premises within walking distance of the
Premises from the Licensing Manager and a Schedule of agreed and disputed
conditions from the Applicant.
Prior to the hearing, the Applicant made the other
parties aware of her intention to remove live and record music from her application.
This was confirmed to the Sub-Committee during the Applicant’s submissions.
Also prior to the hearing, the Police made an application under
Regulation 14(2) of the Licensing Act 2003 (Hearings) Regulations 2005, to
exclude the public from part of the hearing. Submissions on the application
were made by the Police and the Applicant in private and the Sub-Committee
determined that the public interest in excluding the public from part of the
Police’s submissions outweighed the public interest in hearing them in public.
The exclusion was restricted to what was necessary and proportionate in
maintaining the public interest and the remainder of the Police’s submissions
were heard in public.
DETERMINATION
The
Sub-Committee has considered the relevant representations, the evidence
received before the hearing and the oral submissions and evidence heard from
all parties at the hearing.
In
reaching its decision, the Sub-Committee have also taken into consideration the
Licensing Objectives, all of which are relevant but more so the prevention of
crime and disorder and public nuisance, as well as the statutory guidance, the
relevant case law and Council’s own Licensing Policy.
The Sub Committee resolved to grant the application
subject to the hours and the conditions below:-
HOURS
Monday – Wednesday |
11:00 - 23:30 |
|
Thursday, Friday,
Saturday |
11:00 – 00:30 |
|
Sunday |
11:00 – 23:30 |
|
Supply of Alcohol (on
premises) |
Monday – Wednesday |
11:00 - 23:00 |
Thursday, Friday,
Saturday |
11:00 – 00:00 |
|
Sunday |
11:00 – 23:00 |
|
Late Night Refreshment |
Thursday, Friday,
Saturday |
23:00 – 00:00 |
CONDITIONS
A.
Operating Schedule
1.
No children on the premises at any times.
2.
Regular toilet checks.
3.
Last entry to premises will be 30 minutes
before terminal hour.
4.
First aid on premises.
5.
Only toughened glassware to be used.
6.
No glasses outside the premises.
7.
Notice will be displayed asking for patrons to
respect neighbours.
8.
No nudity or semi nudity at any time.
B.
Police Conditions
Prevention of Crime & Disorder
A CCTV system shall be used and shall be designed and installed in
accordance with the Cheshire Constabulary’s CCTV guidance document called ‘CCTV
in Licensed Premises – An Operational Requirement’. This system shall be in operation at all times when licensable activities are
taking place.
Recorded CCTV images will be maintained and stored for a period of
twenty-eight days.
A staff member from
the premises who is conversant with the operation of the CCTV system shall be on the premises at all times when the premises are open
to the public. This staff member shall be able to show/provide footage to a
Police officer or an authorised officer of the
licensing authority data or footage upon request. Any requests for CCTV shall
be complied with, within 48 hours or less, or otherwise as agreed to comply
with data protection legislation.
Designated premises supervisors will need to demonstrate that their CCTV
system complies with their Operational requirements. They will need to be able
to demonstrate the following:-
Risk
Assessed Door Staff
When there is a private function or event with regulated entertainment
being held at the premises the Premises Licence
Holder or Designated Premises Supervisor shall conduct an
assessment of the need for SIA registered door supervisors, taking into
account any advice offered by the Police.
Where the assessment shows that door supervision is required,
supervisors shall be engaged at such times and ratios as are assessed to be
necessary.
The risk assessment will be documented in a book kept for that purpose
and will be made available to the police or an officer from the Licensing
Authority upon reasonable request.
When such Door
supervision is employed:-
A written
record shall be kept on the premises by the Designated Premises Supervisor of
every person employed on the premises as a door supervisor in a register kept
for that purpose. That record shall contain the following details:-
The
register shall be available for inspection on demand by an Authorised
Officer of the Council, the Security Industry Authority
or a Police Constable.
Incident Log
The premises shall maintain an Incident Log, and this will be made
available to the Police or Licensing Authority upon request.
Search Policy
When Door Supervisors are present, the
Premise Licence Holder shall put in place a search policy to cover both drugs
and weapons for the premises, which shall be to the satisfaction of Cheshire
Constabulary. The Premises Licence Holder or Designated Premises Supervisor
shall then ensure that this search policy is complied with at
all times when the premises are open for licensable activities and door
supervisors are employed.
Conspicuous notices advising customers of
the search policy shall be displayed at all entrances to the premises.
There shall be a suitable secure location
available for the safe storage of suspected drugs seized or found in the premises.
The items to be placed within Police supplied drugs bags and appropriately
labelled and sealed until handed over to the Police.
Anyone with drugs or weapons are to be refused entry, this is to be
recorded in a refusals book kept for this purpose.
Drugs
The premises will operate a zero tolerance to drugs policy on the
premises.
Prominent signage will be displayed in the toilets at the premises to advise
patrons that management have a zero tolerance to drugs policy in place.
Anyone caught with drugs are to be asked to leave the premises
immediately.
Public
Safety
An effective method of communication between
the licenced premises and other premises in the town and the Police shall be in
operation at times when the premises is open to the public, so long as such
method is approved by the Police.
Protection of Children from Harm
A “Challenge 25” policy shall be operated at the
premises at all times.
The only forms of ID that shall be accepted (at the discretion of the
Management) as proof of age are a valid passport, a valid photographic driving
licence, a PASS approved proof of age card, HM Services Warrant Card or other
reliable photo ID (that has been approved for acceptance by the Police or an
Officer of the Local Authority) or other forms of ID approved by the Home
Office for age verification relating to sales of alcohol.
Publicity materials notifying customers of the operation of the “Challenge
25” scheme shall be displayed at the premises, including entrances and hall and
include the message that it is illegal to sell alcohol to under 18’s.
The Designated Premises Supervisor or Premises Licence Holder shall
operate and maintain an up-to-date Register of Refusals of Sale of Alcohol,
indicating the date, time and reason for refusal which shall be made available
for inspection by Local Authority Officers and the Police. The register can
either be hard-copy or part of a till prompt system.
The DPS or other responsible person shall check and sign the register
once a week, if hard copy.
A documented training programme shall be introduced for all
staff in a position to sell, serve or deliver alcohol. A written record
for each member of staff shall be kept of the content of such training and
shall be made available for inspection at the request of Local Authority
Officers and Police.
The DPS or Premises Licence Holder shall conduct six monthly training
reviews with all members of staff authorised to sell, serve
or deliver alcohol in order to reinforce the training and to promote best
practice. A written record for each member of staff shall be kept of the
content of such reviews and shall be made available for inspection at the
request of Local Authority Officers and Police.
A list of persons authorised to sell alcohol shall be kept on site and
made available for inspection at the request of Local Authority Officers and
Police.
C.
Environmental Health Conditions
Patrons who wish to smoke will be directed to the front of the premises
on Albert Road. Smoking shall not be permitted on Ross Steet.
With the exception of pre-booked and advertised regulated
entertainment the volume of music to be kept to a level that it could be
considered incidental / background music.
All windows and doors are to be kept closed after 21:00 save for access
and egress.
D.
Additional Conditions
A cigarette receptacle shall be provided on the outside of the premises
facing Albert Road to enable the disposal of cigarette butts.
At the start and close of the hours of operation, the pavements
immediately outside of the premises on Albert Road and Ross Street must be
swept and/or washed and litter and sweepings collected and disposed of in the
premises waste receptacles.
Between the hours of 22:00 and 6:00, no waste or glass bottles shall be
moved or deposited outside.
At the start of any regulated entertainment a check will be undertaken
outside of 2 Ross Street to ascertain whether the volume of the entertainment
is likely to cause a public nuisance. A log will be maintained showing when the
check was undertaken and to confirm that the level is deemed not to be loud
enough to cause a public nuisance. If any action is taken to reduce the volume
this is to be recorded. A copy of the log will be made available for inspection
by the Responsible Authorities.
E.
Mandatory Conditions
As required under section 19 and 21
of the Licensing Act 2003.
REASONS FOR DETERMINATION
The reasons for the
Sub-Committee’s decision is as follows:-
i.
In respect of the prevention of crime and disorder, the
Sub-Committee has taken into consideration the statutory guidance which
provides that licensing authorities should look to the Police as the main
source of advice on crime and disorder. It has therefore placed significant
weight on their concerns. However, the Sub-Committee does not consider there is
compelling evidence to refuse the application and the concerns of the Police
were adequately dealt with by the conditions they have proposed in the
alternative to a refusal.
ii.
In support of this,
evidence was heard from the Police that the applicant is of good character and
that they have no issues with her per se. Significantly, no evidence was
provided to demonstrate that she had any connection to the previous business,
Annie’s Bar.
iii.
Furthermore, significant weight was placed on the
Applicant’s evidence that despite her young age, she had 5 years of experience
in the industry working at Wetherspoons and had grown up in pubs as her father
was the manager of a pub in the local area. The Sub Committee was also
reassured by the fact that she would be supported by her stepsister who has
over 10 years’ experience in the trade and who would have a significant role in
Banksey’s Bar as it was a joint venture; her father
who has over 17 years’ experience; and the manager of Banksey’s
Bar, Gavin Pye who also has over 8 years’ experience. The Sub Committee agreed
that together this was a substantially experienced team to manage the Premises
in a safe and responsible manner.
iv.
As for the residents’ evidence which detailed various
incidents of anti-social behaviour at the premises
when it was known as Annie’s Bar, the statutory guidance is clear that each
application must be considered on its own merits. Banksey’s
Bar is a different business to Annie’s Bar and is ran by different people. The
applicant emphasized that Banksey’s Bar would be a
wine bar/ café and, at some point in the future, may also offer tapas and
finger plates. Unlike Annie’s Bar, the focus is not on music or dancing which
is demonstrated by the fact that they have replaced the dance floor with more
seating and are no longer seeking regulated entertainment. The Sub-Committee
noted that this was corroborated later on by the
Environmental Health Officer, Mr Wilson, who advised
that the layout of the Premises was different to Annie’s Bar and stated that he
would be surprised if the Premises became another Annie’s Bar. It was also
noted that some of Ms Halliday’s fears were allayed
on hearing the applicant’s evidence. As such, the Sub Committee found there was
no evidence that the Premises would be operated like Annie’s Bar and, although
not currently in operation, there was evidence that it would be a calmer bar
with a different target of clientele. Furthermore, the Police conditions on
CCTV, the use of door staff for regulated events, and search and drugs policies
adequately deal with any such potential risks of crime and disorder. These
conditions are also in accordance with the Council’s own statement of policy.
v.
As for public nuisance, the Sub Committee has every
sympathy with the residents given the past issues but again it must consider
the application on its merits. That said, evidence was heard on the size of the
premises, it is very close location to residential premises and the fact that
Premises’ main door and windows were on Ross Street which is primarily
residential. Ms Fletcher, in
particular, described the houses on Ross Street being close to the
Premises as they were terrace houses and that there were no grass verges to
mitigate the impact of any noise. She also recounted how she would hear glass
bottles being thrown out in the early hours of the morning when the premises
was Annie’s Bar despite living 13 doors away. As such, Sub-Committee considered
that the noise related conditions, particularly conditions 34, 35, 36, 39 and
40, were necessary to promote this licensing objective.
vi.
In respect of the sound limiter condition proposed by
Environmental Health, the Sub-Committee is mindful of the statutory guidance on
this and considers that this condition is disproportionate and not justified in light of the amendment to the licensing hours (discussed
further below) and the other conditions.
vii.
In addition, evidence was heard from the applicant
that smokers would be directed to the front of the Premises on Albert Road. The
Sub-Committee therefore considered conditions on providing a cigarette bin and
keeping the area immediately outside the Premises clean were also necessary and
proportionate.
viii.
As for the remaining licensing objections – protection
from children from harm and public safety – again the Sub Committee considered
that the Police conditions adequately deal with these concerns as do the
conditions proposed by the applicant on the operating schedule.
ix.
Submissions were also heard from the residents about
the proposed hours of the license. In taking into account
the Council’s statement of licensing policy, particularly paragraphs 39 and 48,
the Sub Committee considered that the close proximity of the Premises to the
residential premises justified a reduction in the hours, so as not to undermine
the licensing objections, particularly the prevention of statutory nuisance as
discussed further at paragraph v. above. The Sub Committee considers that the
new hours strike the right balance between the interests of the residents who
live in Ross Street and the Applicant’s business.
The Sub-Committee
have been comforted by the cooperative nature of the Applicant and the
willingness to work with residents going forward. Again
this shows how she is a responsible business owner. It is hoped that this open
communication is maintained by all parties, if there
are future issues.
If issues do crop
up, the Sub-Committee would like to remind residents that there are powers
to deal with premises if a licence leads to the licensing objectives being
undermined. Not least is the power for residents or responsible authorities to
bring review proceedings where steps can be taken to restrict the licence,
impose further conditions or, in extreme circumstances, revoke the licence when
evidence shows issues result from a licensable activity. Action can also be
taken separately by environmental health in relation to statutory noise
nuisance, if reported. The sub-committee hopes that this brings some
reassurance to the residents.
TIME THAT THE DETERMINATION SHALL
TAKE EFFECT
Forthwith.
Supporting documents: