Minutes:
The Board
considered a report of the Strategic Director – Children and Young People
summarising the responses to the Statutory Consultation on the closure of
Fairfield High School and the expansion of Wade Deacon High School, outlining
the background, statutory consultation undertaken, financial implications and
the decision making process.
In addition,
a further report was tabled at the meeting. It was reported that this report had
been considered in detail by the Cross Party Members Advisory Working Group on
15th May 2008. The report
detailed the rationale for the proposal, identified who had been consulted, the
response to the consultation and the issues raised, it provided a summary of
previous consultations, transitional arrangements and the reasons, factors and
criteria which needed consideration prior to a decision on the proposal.
It was
reported that the Cross Party Members Advisory Group had been unanimous in
their support for the closure of Fairfield High School due to declining pupil
numbers and the expansion of Wade Deacon, which was a successful and popular
school. The Group also supported the encouragement of both schools to
collaborate quickly prior to the establishment of a hard federation.
The Board
received a further update in respect of the overall position covering:
· the Academy proposal and the position regarding potential sites, sponsors
and the size of the post 16 provision being 200 planned pupil places;
· the Grange, where the schools were currently consulting on the proposals
to establish a hard federation;
· The Bankfield;
· The Heath;
· Chestnut Lodge and Ashley Schools; and
· meeting with Partnership for Schools in respect of the Council’s
projected pupil numbers – it was advised that the Partnership was in agreement
with the Council's pupil numbers and the methodology used.
The
Statutory Consultation that had been undertaken, outlined in Appendix A to the
tabled report, was described in detail to the Board. In particular, the Board
noted that only thirteen of the responses received had disagreed with the
proposal to close Fairfield High School.
Appendix C
within this document outlined a summary of objections. Appendix D provided
outlined the summary of responses to the proposal to expand Wade Deacon High
School. Appendix E and F detailed all
the key issues raised in writing by the respondents to the consultation. Members were provided with a summary of all
the questions and detailed answers to each issue raised were considered by the
Board. This information was included in
the separate report Appendix B and included information on school size, pupil
projections, class size, traffic and safety, use of site, extended and
community use, choice, culture, shared sports, admissions, funding, governing
body, improvements, site assessment and communication.
In
particular, it was noted that the Department for Children, Skills and Families
(DCSF) and OFSTED Inspections of schools did not support the assertion that
larger schools meant lower standards of behaviour. It was reported that there
were benefits to having larger schools in terms of enhanced facilities and
funding and that a model of smaller units or “schools within school” so that,
to pupils, the school did not look or feel large.
Members
recalled that, in the second round of consultation, an alternative proposal had
been submitted by Fairfield High School. The Executive Board had previously
found that the alternative proposal was incomplete and flawed and lacked
information crucial to its proper evaluation. The school had been advised of
the information that was necessary for evaluation and discussions had been held
with the school to clarify the information needed. However, no new information
or other alternative options had been submitted.
It was
confirmed that school travel plans would have to be developed for the new site
and all efforts would be made in the interim period to minimise pupil movement.
Congestion was a concern and the school and Local Authority would be encouraged
to look at ways to manage this, for example by trialling different start and
end times for pupils. Planning for vehicular access and quick routes in and out
of school would be required in the site development under BSF.
The Board
further noted that it had been suggested that the rationale to close Fairfield
High School was in order that the Council could sell the land. The Board was
advised that the closure was due to the declining pupil numbers. Members noted
that the land would transfer to the Local Authority from September 2010 but
would be managed on an interim basis by Wade Deacon. Consideration would be
given to retaining some part of the land for future community use once it was
no longer needed by Wade Deacon in 2013. An undertaking had been made that if
any of the land were sold, the proceeds would go to the BSF funding envelope for
the good of the pupils of the Borough. In addition, through BSF, the Authority
was looking to offer more extended provision and community access.
In terms of
Fairfield's Performing Arts Specialism, it was advised that options were
currently being discussed and explored with the SSAT part of DCSF regarding
retaining this at Wade Deacon in the interim period, and the future options for
an additional specialism for Wade Deacon if, after a re-inspection by Ofsted, it
retained its high performance status.
In terms of
disruption to pupils during future capital building work, which would need
undertaking across the authority, the Council was confident that this could be
kept to a minimum through robust project management and good communication as
previously evidenced at St. Chad’s Catholic High School. Furthermore, it was
explained that, through the BSF programme, the Authority would be looking to
enhance the sports facilities at Wade Deacon.
The Board
then went through each of the factors/criteria for consideration in detail
outlined at Appendix G, contained within Appendix A to the tabled report,
outlining implications for both the closing school and the expanding school. In
terms of federation, it was advised that this was for the two schools to agree.
The Council had encouraged a Hard Federation but could not impose this.
Additional support could be provided by the Authority for both schools if
federation was supported.
Further
information was also provided in terms of the Workforce Strategy, the Strategy
for Change and the Gateway Review. It was advised that the Gateway Review Team
had concluded that the current programme development was a healthy programme
with some operational recommendations.
The Board
commended the Strategic Director - Children and Young People, the Operational
Director – Business Planning and Resources, and the BSF Programme Director, and
all those who had been involved in this process to date.
Reason(s) for
Decision
The reasons
for the decision and the main factors/criteria considered to close Fairfield
High School and expand Wade Deacon High school were:
·
due to the
continuing decline in pupil numbers. Insufficient pupil numbers were forecast
in Widnes to ensure the continued financial and curriculum viability of
Fairfield High School;
·
expansion of
Wade Deacon High School a successful and popular school; and
·
as further
detailed in the Building Schools for the Future Report (Appendix A ) document
Appendix G (15th May 2008).
Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
In the first
and second round of consultation a number of alternative options were proposed,
each of these was assessed and evaluated in detail, in particular in relation
to the government criteria.
Implementation
Date
The decision to close Fairfield High school would take effect from 31st
August 2010 and to expand Wade Deacon High school from 1st September 2010.
RESOLVED:
That having regard to the statutory guidance and in pursuance of the powers set
out in Part 2 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 and the related
regulations, the following related proposals be approved:
(1) with effect from 31st
August 2010, Fairfield High School be discontinued;
(2) with effect from 1st
September 2010, Wade Deacon High School be expanded by the admission number for
that school being increased to 300 to give effect to the enlargement of the
school;
(3) with effect from 1st
September 2010, the Wade Deacon admission numbers for Years 8 to 11 be expanded
to accommodate pupils transferring from Fairfield High School;
(4) with effect from 1st
September 2010 the Fairfield High School Site (detailed on Plan Ref. F1
attached to the report) be appropriated from the Children and Young People
Directorate to Corporate to be managed as an integral part of the Council’s
corporate estate but that the Council permits the Fairfield School site to be
managed on an interim and revocable basis as part of the Wade Deacon “campus”
from 1st September 2010 to continue until 1st September
2013 or such later date as the Chief Executive may prescribe; and
(5) the Chief Executive be authorised to take whatever actions are necessary to give effect to the above decisions.
Supporting documents: